Tweet
YTD: 0-0
As always, I play straight underdogs and have been profitable the last two years since moving from capping games to blind plays.
NYR +130
TOR +120
NYI +100
WAS +100
CAR +100
DET +120
CBS +150
COL +120
ANA +135
NHL 2011-2012: 122-118 // 50.83 % // +14.98 units (I quit in late December because of some family issues)
NHL 2010-2011: 149-142 // 51.20% // +32.35 units (followed this strategy midway throughout the year, but total for the year with my capping was 202-186-3, +29.29 units)
So it definitely requires using a smaller percent of bankroll per bet (I use 0.5% because there can be some swings), but if I start doing well, I will up that to 0.75 or 1%).
Good luck guys. I know there aren't many NHL cappers, but I wanted to show /post that I've found straight line dogs have been well for me. You're better off if you have multiple books as you want to get the best out of these lines, but I've found it takes less time with just one book. Betus.com.pa is a great underdog book that I use.
As always, I play straight underdogs and have been profitable the last two years since moving from capping games to blind plays.
NYR +130
TOR +120
NYI +100
WAS +100
CAR +100
DET +120
CBS +150
COL +120
ANA +135
NHL 2011-2012: 122-118 // 50.83 % // +14.98 units (I quit in late December because of some family issues)
NHL 2010-2011: 149-142 // 51.20% // +32.35 units (followed this strategy midway throughout the year, but total for the year with my capping was 202-186-3, +29.29 units)
So it definitely requires using a smaller percent of bankroll per bet (I use 0.5% because there can be some swings), but if I start doing well, I will up that to 0.75 or 1%).
Good luck guys. I know there aren't many NHL cappers, but I wanted to show /post that I've found straight line dogs have been well for me. You're better off if you have multiple books as you want to get the best out of these lines, but I've found it takes less time with just one book. Betus.com.pa is a great underdog book that I use.
Comment