Tweet
Record: 3-3
I believe in giving second chances.
Two weeks back the Vikings screwed me. They held Jax to a measly 7 pts but STILL didn't get me a W, when laying 6 they won by 5.
My fault really, I bought late in the week and could have gotten a win with a better that was easy to get Mon thru Wed.
On Sunday, I'm riding with the Vikes again (hopefully to Valhalla this time.)
And hopefully I'll get a little revenge too, betting against Chicago, who cost me a W last week when, AGAIN, I had a winner who just didn't cover a small spread, this time the Packers.
Yes, revenge s NOT a reason to bet but I have others stats going for me in this game. Stats like this:
WF2 says the Bears should be the Fav.
WF2 Hm teams are just 14-27, a 65% Fade with > 40 games in the data sample.
The line is at Min -3'.
There's extra juice on the Dog price so I can buy it to a FG for relatively cheap.
Min -3, -120
I believe in giving second chances.
Two weeks back the Vikings screwed me. They held Jax to a measly 7 pts but STILL didn't get me a W, when laying 6 they won by 5.
My fault really, I bought late in the week and could have gotten a win with a better that was easy to get Mon thru Wed.
On Sunday, I'm riding with the Vikes again (hopefully to Valhalla this time.)
And hopefully I'll get a little revenge too, betting against Chicago, who cost me a W last week when, AGAIN, I had a winner who just didn't cover a small spread, this time the Packers.
Yes, revenge s NOT a reason to bet but I have others stats going for me in this game. Stats like this:
WF2 says the Bears should be the Fav.
WF2 Hm teams are just 14-27, a 65% Fade with > 40 games in the data sample.
The line is at Min -3'.
There's extra juice on the Dog price so I can buy it to a FG for relatively cheap.
Min -3, -120
Comment