Polar Playoffs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Polar Ice
    Assistant to the Manager
    • Dec 2010
    • 215

    Polar Playoffs

    updated record: 11-4-1 (+6.7 units)

    Seattle +10 - Going with the team that nobody is giving a snowball's chance in hell (with the exception of Daws and a few others), but probably deservedly so. Either way, I still feel there's value in this pick regardless of Seattle's record or stats.

    Plus this is the first game of the weekend so if it loses I'll just take a page out of Lang's book and chase it. :laughing:

    GL :thumbs:
    2010 NCAAF: 10-5 (+4.5 units)
    2010 NFL: 18-5 (+12.6 units)
    2010 NCAAB: 34-24 (+8.6 units)
    2011 MLB: 33-50 (-10.34 units)

    *Past performance is not an indication of future results.
  • Q-Unit
    Offensive Coordinator
    • Feb 2007
    • 5180

    #2
    hope SEA can pressure Brees, because with Chris Ivory out, their running game will be almost non-existent. I havent seen enough from Bush or JJones to think they won't throw it 30+

    GL bro :beerbang:
    :hide:

    "Schooly D is fat cake yo."
    -Big Pimpin-

    Comment

    • msl1014
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 225

      #3
      GL Polar with ya on Seattle
      NFL: 10-8 (+1.1 U)
      Spreads: 7-6 (+.3 U)
      Totals: 3-2 (+.8 U)

      NBA: 20-16 (+.5 U)
      Spreads: 19-14 (+3.5 U)
      Totals: 1-1 (-.1 U)
      Moneylines: 0-1 (-2 U)
      Parlays: 0-1 (-1 U)

      NCAABB: 22-20 (+1.1 U)
      Spreads: 21-18 (+2.2 U)
      Totals: 1-1 (-.1 U)
      Parlays: 0-1 (-1 U)

      NCAA Football: 4-10 (-7.05 U)
      Spreads: 2-7 (-7.0 U)
      Moneylines: 2-1 (+1.96 U)
      Totals: 0-2 (-2.2 U)

      Soccer: 4-2 (+5.44 U)
      Three Way Betting: 2-1 (+2.38 U)
      ML Parlays: 1-1 (+.31 U)
      Props: 1-0 (+1.75 U)

      Comment

      • joepa66
        MOD Squad
        • Mar 2007
        • 24925

        #4
        Gotta throw it against the Salties weak pass D.....but the rain is what concerns me!
        GL Magnum P.I. :beerbang:
        Batman: "If you can't spend it, money's just a lot of worthless paper, isn't it?" :phew:

        Comment

        • rawhide
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2007
          • 1420

          #5
          They say " great minds think alike! Lets get em Polar:thumbs:
          Ya gotta look out for #1 or your gonna step in #2
          -Rodney Dangerfield

          Comment

          • Polar Ice
            Assistant to the Manager
            • Dec 2010
            • 215

            #6
            Thx guys. Seattle almost gave that one away so was glad to have the 10 pts.

            Updated record: 12-4-1 (7.7 units)

            Adding:

            KC +3 - To start, I think the Balt D is a little overrated and getting more credit than they deserve. This isn't 2000, this is 2011. The D is good, I just don't think they're as good as everyone makes them out to be. Couple this with the fact that they have been outgained in yardage by Cincy, Cleveland, Houston, Pitt, Atl, and Buff, during a stretch where they only actually lost two of those games to Atl and Pitt. I'll admit KC has had an easier schedule (although this is the NFL where it shouldn't matter), but they have been the more consistent team and I still feel that I'm getting some value with them, especially at home.

            GB +2.5 - Initial thought is that its way to easy to take Philly, at home, @ -2.5 spread (of course they'll win by 3, right?), with the everybody eating out of Vicks hands. I posted in a previous thread that I think Philly's time was over with in November and I'm sticking to that theory with this game. I just think Philly has been on a downhill slide to end the season while GB finished strong. To use statistics (which I don't normally believe in) - Philly lost in yardage the last two games to Dallas and Minnesota (neither team a powerhouse) by 28 and 6 yds, respectively . The game before that, it took a miracle for them to come from behind against the NYG. For these reasons I see Philly on a downhill slide and am willing to fade. Only problem with this one is that Vick has the intangibles that can't be accounted for, and could come alive at any time.

            GL all. :thumbs:
            2010 NCAAF: 10-5 (+4.5 units)
            2010 NFL: 18-5 (+12.6 units)
            2010 NCAAB: 34-24 (+8.6 units)
            2011 MLB: 33-50 (-10.34 units)

            *Past performance is not an indication of future results.

            Comment

            • Q-Unit
              Offensive Coordinator
              • Feb 2007
              • 5180

              #7
              Originally posted by Polar Ice
              is that Vick has the intangibles that can't be accounted for, and could come alive at any time.
              last time Vick faced GB in the playoffs, he thoroughly thrashed their coveted "never lost a playoff game at home" streak.

              But agree with you here, I think GB's D will be the difference, despite their one-sided offense.

              :beerbang:

              while you're here, why don't you ask around for the cheapest Vegas hotel with a sportsbook lol
              :hide:

              "Schooly D is fat cake yo."
              -Big Pimpin-

              Comment

              Working...