MNF

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stifler's Mom
    Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 8541

    MNF

    After taking a beating yesterday from a combination of bad picks and tough beats...

    sides 76-63 (+11.60 units)
    dog ml's 18-30 (-0.55 units)
    overall 94-93 (+11.05 units)

    Bills -5

    2 units


    After failing to cover 3 straight games now, and looking poor in the process, the Bills are still a -5 fave tonight over the Winslow Vaingas. Why? -3.5 seems more than sufficient to me, given the circumstances....maybe even the standard -3 for homefield.

    CLE is a soft team, especially on offense. The Pats and Jets used the short passing game along with the run both on later downs, and later in the game once they had the BUF defense tired out to have their way. BUF was never able to adjust, and as a result looked BAD. I don't think CLE can follow this mold, and we should see a BUF team that more resembles the 5-1 form to begin the year, rather than the 0-3 L3 games team.

    Might not hurt that the fans tonight in Buffalo should be pretty fired up for a rare MNF game, and Orchard Park isn't an easy place to play in the first place.

    Also see a few taking the points cause it's "too many". Seems the line is doing its job, since it doesn't sound too confident that some opinions on why CLE will cover think they are the right choice to actually win outright to me....so I'll stick with pick the winner for this MNF game that the Bills must have, and should be able to get against a soft Browns team.

    Oh yea, Whitner should be in the line up tonight. Should help a Bills 2ndary that has not looked so hot with journeymen taking his place the last few weeks.
  • Stifler's Mom
    Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 8541

    #2
    LOL, -4 turnover margin, and some nice prevent OFFENSE there at the end with those 3 pathetic runs...not to mention the missed FG.

    Talk about handing a game away to a terrible team :puke:

    Yea well, maybe next year

    Comment

    • Underdog88
      I drink your milkshake!!!
      • Mar 2007
      • 13981

      #3
      Originally posted by Stifler's Mom
      Yea well, maybe next year
      maybe not even. Jauron & his idiotic playcalling yet again :bang:
      Champagne for my real friends, real pain for my sham friends...

      Comment

      • cdb3444
        Lets Go Saints!
        • Nov 2008
        • 9

        #4
        should of known that was gonna happen, he had 7 turnovers in the last 2 games he played.... i took the browns+6.
        He also hasnt thrown more then 1 TD per game in the last 3 hes played...

        Comment

        • Underdog88
          I drink your milkshake!!!
          • Mar 2007
          • 13981

          #5
          Originally posted by cdb3444
          should of known that was gonna happen, he had 7 turnovers in the last 2 games he played.... i took the browns+6.
          And that's why you created a thread asking to pay for picks you dick :thumbs:
          Champagne for my real friends, real pain for my sham friends...

          Comment

          • cdb3444
            Lets Go Saints!
            • Nov 2008
            • 9

            #6
            well actually i went 6-1 in college picks and 9-2 NFL think im doing pretty good but i still like 2 have someones input and something to read up on about the game statistics....
            No need to call me a dick i said nothing wrong...

            Comment

            • Underdog88
              I drink your milkshake!!!
              • Mar 2007
              • 13981

              #7
              Originally posted by cdb3444
              well actually i went 6-1 in college picks and 9-2 NFL think im doing pretty good but i still like 2 have someones input and something to read up on about the game statistics....
              No need to call me a dick i said nothing wrong...

              I went 24-1 in my last 25 unposted picks too :beerbang:


              Called u a dick because you came into Stif's thread after he lost his wager to say "shoulda known that..." & saying you were on the winning side after the fact. Nobody cares about your unposted record either...
              Champagne for my real friends, real pain for my sham friends...

              Comment

              • BoKnows
                SEC!Any Questions?
                • Mar 2007
                • 1089

                #8
                Originally posted by cdb3444
                should of known that was gonna happen, he had 7 turnovers in the last 2 games he played.... i took the browns+6.
                He also hasnt thrown more then 1 TD per game in the last 3 hes played...


                :ohman: :bang:Of course any dumbass could have seen it WTF..."should have known"

                Comment

                • Stifler's Mom
                  Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 8541

                  #9
                  What a dick bag. Obviously a full of **** tout, who knows nothing about football.

                  Edwards @ home vs a bad Browns defense does not equate to @ NE or @ MIA, or even @ home vs the NYJ.

                  Stay the **** out of my threads if all you have to say is nonsense

                  Comment

                  Working...