NFL Sunday

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stifler's Mom
    Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 8541

    #16
    Yea really, Miami is lucky they won that game outright, let alone covered nearly a double digit spread.....

    Comment

    • BoilerBacker
      Big 10 Commish/Moderator
      • Mar 2007
      • 25090

      #17
      LMAO at the cover for the 2H in NO game. I will take it though.

      Houston has killed me all year.
      Go Boilers!
      Thru 12/14

      NCAAB 135-125-3 -18.88 units
      2* 2-6
      3* 2-5
      1H 5-13-1
      2H 126-101-2

      Comment

      • Ca$hMony
        Banned
        • Aug 2008
        • 262

        #18
        Originally posted by Underdog88
        Carolina 1-2 su on the road with their sole win coming on a last second td. Why would you want to lay points with them? Bye week doesn't really mean that much IMO...



        As far as Seattle, they were covering pretty much the whole game lol!



        GL BB :thumbs:
        Underdog - it's the other way around - Seattle scored with 2:57 in the 4th qtr - Miami had covered the spread in the 4th qtr but was content to let Sea go down and score knowing they needed 2pt covernsion... :beer2:

        Comment

        • tdawgmd
          Member
          • Sep 2007
          • 187

          #19
          Originally posted by Ca$hMony
          Underdog - it's the other way around - Seattle scored with 2:57 in the 4th qtr - Miami had covered the spread in the 4th qtr but was content to let Sea go down and score knowing they needed 2pt covernsion... :beer2:
          No way they were laying back on that last drive. Sea was covering that whole game save for 2 minutes in the 4th. Sea was the right side all the way--particularly with the public pounding the dolphins the way they were.

          Comment

          • BoilerBacker
            Big 10 Commish/Moderator
            • Mar 2007
            • 25090

            #20
            Originally posted by Ca$hMony
            Underdog - it's the other way around - Seattle scored with 2:57 in the 4th qtr - Miami had covered the spread in the 4th qtr but was content to let Sea go down and score knowing they needed 2pt covernsion... :beer2:
            I am rather confused by this comment. I see you have the drunk beer guy in your post, but .....

            1. For me, Sea was covering or pushing the entire 2H.

            2. Why would any team let another drive down field up 8? They were only a 2 Pt conversion from tying the game.
            Go Boilers!
            Thru 12/14

            NCAAB 135-125-3 -18.88 units
            2* 2-6
            3* 2-5
            1H 5-13-1
            2H 126-101-2

            Comment

            • JohnnyMapleLeaf
              Banned
              • Feb 2007
              • 8456

              #21
              Originally posted by BoilerBacker
              I am rather confused by this comment. I see you have the drunk beer guy in your post, but .....

              1. For me, Sea was covering or pushing the entire 2H.

              2. Why would any team let another drive down field up 8? They were only a 2 Pt conversion from tying the game.
              Actually the line closed at 7.5, so Seattle was technically down ATS with less than 3 minutes left.

              But, yeah...that's a head-scratcher of a comment...as if Miami wouldn't play 100% only up 8! lol. Seattle scored that late TD, and covered fair and square...props to 'em.

              I guess as a Miami backer...the fact for me was Miami was covering and/or pushing with 3 minutes left in the game, and Seattle hadn't scored an offensive touchdown all game. I was liking my chances at that moment. lol. Props to Wallace and that offense for scoring on that drive...can't hold anything against them! After they got the 6...I was hoping for an outright win for sure!!

              Comment

              • BoilerBacker
                Big 10 Commish/Moderator
                • Mar 2007
                • 25090

                #22
                Add

                NYG-Philly under 21 -105 2H ......................................1*

                GL :beerbang:
                Go Boilers!
                Thru 12/14

                NCAAB 135-125-3 -18.88 units
                2* 2-6
                3* 2-5
                1H 5-13-1
                2H 126-101-2

                Comment

                • BoilerBacker
                  Big 10 Commish/Moderator
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 25090

                  #23
                  Add

                  NYG PK +115 2H .......................................2*

                  Kind of a hedge on my Philly play. Philly looked better in the 2Q but it is obvious which is the better team.

                  GL :beerbang:
                  Go Boilers!
                  Thru 12/14

                  NCAAB 135-125-3 -18.88 units
                  2* 2-6
                  3* 2-5
                  1H 5-13-1
                  2H 126-101-2

                  Comment

                  Working...