Anyone think that it might not be as high if so many Monday nighters this year hadn't gone over already? If this was a Sunday afternoon game, I feel like this total would be somewhere around 44 but since Monday nighters have been point-fests this year, it's set a little higher. I feel like this line is BEGGING for bets on the over based on the past, but UNDER might be the way to go here? Does this make sense?
In two road games this year, Denver has scored 41 @ OAK (W) and 19 @ KC (L). The Pats at home have scored 17 vs. KC (W) and 13 vs. MIA (L). Foxboro has been less than kind to them this year and I really don't think this is the same team that used to light up the board on primetime.
Just a thought? I'm still not sure what side I'll be on and I'm still picking up the pieces after getting smacked around yesterday. Early lean is Den +3 and Under 48.5
In two road games this year, Denver has scored 41 @ OAK (W) and 19 @ KC (L). The Pats at home have scored 17 vs. KC (W) and 13 vs. MIA (L). Foxboro has been less than kind to them this year and I really don't think this is the same team that used to light up the board on primetime.
Just a thought? I'm still not sure what side I'll be on and I'm still picking up the pieces after getting smacked around yesterday. Early lean is Den +3 and Under 48.5