If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
see i don't get this. why is that a silly number? NE has routintely covered that number in the 1H and this is week 12. it might be a silly number if Denver was playing Philly, but when NE has constantly covered those numbers, i don't understand fading them at this point. but JMO
see i don't get this. why is that a silly number? NE has routintely covered that number in the 1H and this is week 12. it might be a silly number if Denver was playing Philly, but when NE has constantly covered those numbers, i don't understand fading them at this point. but JMO
Law of averages, what goes up must come down. It's not like the game even needs to be close for Philly to cover.... 37-14 & Philly covers. That's silly to me. Of course NE could come out & win by 40+, but I couldn't sleep knowing I didn't play a +24 dog in the NFL....
Champagne for my real friends, real pain for my sham friends...
Law of averages, what goes up must come down. It's not like the game even needs to be close for Philly to cover.... 37-14 & Philly covers. That's silly to me. Of course NE could come out & win by 40+, but I couldn't sleep knowing I didn't play a +24 dog in the NFL....
One thing that concerns me about tonight: Didn't Philly make a stink earlier this year about NE's "cheating" possibly affecting that Super Bowl a few years ago?
Comment