NFL Monday Night Patriots/Bengals In-Game

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • USFMD82
    Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 511

    Something I recently noticed, are these "C" patches on some of the peoples jerseys a new thing I have just recognized them the past 2 weeks, and I would logically think it means Captain, but I could of sworn during the Bucs game I saw 2 different People with a C on their jersey
    Last Wager placed 01/11/09 - Loss
    Taking a sabbatical from wagering

    Comment

    • Touchdown
      Member
      • Sep 2007
      • 397

      sit on the ball and consider it done :beerbang: :beer2: :beer2: :beer2:
      NFL = 13 – 8 – 1 ................................ + 8.5 Unit
      1st & 2nd Half = 5 – 3 – 0 .................. - 2.5 Unit

      CFB = 12– 6 – 1 ................................ + 12.5 Unit
      1st & 2nd Half = 0 – 1 – 0 ................... + 0.0 Unit

      Comment

      • Touchdown
        Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 397

        congrat to all NE and UNDER
        NFL = 13 – 8 – 1 ................................ + 8.5 Unit
        1st & 2nd Half = 5 – 3 – 0 .................. - 2.5 Unit

        CFB = 12– 6 – 1 ................................ + 12.5 Unit
        1st & 2nd Half = 0 – 1 – 0 ................... + 0.0 Unit

        Comment

        • Q-Unit
          Offensive Coordinator
          • Feb 2007
          • 5179

          congrats JML.

          wow, hate watching games (especially) when youre on the wrong side, but IMO though pats handed cincy their asses, I am just not impressed with the pats.

          call it sour grapes, or hatred of ESPN's orgy love gayfest with brady and the cheaters, but still not impressed.

          put up decent points against a team with 2 healthy LBS??!?!

          and wtf is up with the constant 16-0 talk, I agree eddie, freaking week 4. wait til its week 8 at least.

          that whole "players supported belichick", and "game ball to belichick" is just BS.

          plus i lost respect for jaws when he offered his opinion, saying "oh belichick just wants to win" as an excuse for why he was caught CHEATING?@?@?@.

          wtf. yeh i just want to win too, lemme cheat.

          ****ers. LOL
          :hide:

          "Schooly D is fat cake yo."
          -Big Pimpin-

          Comment

          • EddieP
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 1680

            jesus they have some class, thought they would go for another score...........the under holds up:beerbang: :beerbang: :beerbang: congrats to pats backers,i still hate them:beerbang:

            Comment

            • EddieP
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2007
              • 1680

              Originally posted by Q-Unit
              congrats JML.

              wow, hate watching games (especially) when youre on the wrong side, but IMO though pats handed cincy their asses, I am just not impressed with the pats.

              call it sour grapes, or hatred of ESPN's orgy love gayfest with brady and the cheaters, but still not impressed.

              put up decent points against a team with 2 healthy LBS??!?!

              and wtf is up with the constant 16-0 talk, I agree eddie, freaking week 4. wait til its week 8 at least.

              that whole "players supported belichick", and "game ball to belichick" is just BS.

              plus i lost respect for jaws when he offered his opinion, saying "oh belichick just wants to win" as an excuse for why he was caught CHEATING?@?@?@.

              wtf. yeh i just want to win too, lemme cheat.

              ****ers. LOL
              i wanna win too so how the **** can i cheat and win??? any suggestions:beerbang:

              Comment

              • JohnnyMapleLeaf
                Banned
                • Feb 2007
                • 8456

                I agree Q...although I was loving the Pats being comfortably up all game, and I never really felt that it would be in doubt...that Pats and Brady love-in is sickening.....par for the course with these MNF guys though....gawd I hate 'em...is it just me, or is Aikmen the best colour guy in the NFL...

                Comment

                • JohnnyMapleLeaf
                  Banned
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 8456

                  Originally posted by Q-Unit
                  put up decent points against a team with 2 healthy LBS??!?!
                  ANd it continues? The Pats still haven't beat anyone good? Cause Cincy sucks? Or they had no defence? I love it......lmao.....and dallas only beat STL.

                  I'm a fav player who loves Dallas covering. And loves NE covering...sometimes it's smart to pick the right spots with favs just as much it is to pick dogs. I realize it's not as cool...but it can be just as profitable if you;re smart about it.

                  Baseball....12 inning :thumbs:

                  Cleveland +20 next week?? :sm:

                  Comment

                  • Q-Unit
                    Offensive Coordinator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 5179

                    Originally posted by JohnnyMapleLeaf
                    .is it just me, or is Aikmen the best colour guy in the NFL...
                    I like him, Moose Johnson isnt so bad, though being a Cowboys fan, that doesnt lend any credibility.

                    though I can tell you, Joe Buck is a tool, and Aikman would be better off with a better play by player that isnt so much of a tool.

                    and just a disclaimer, as best objectively as I can be, I feel like the Pats, Packers, and Cowboys are media-infested circle jerk love affair inducing vomit machines.

                    all the teams they've played are not that good, they will all be tested soon enough. I hope, or just taking the points cuz you dont want to lay chalk on the road, will hurt this season :bang:
                    :hide:

                    "Schooly D is fat cake yo."
                    -Big Pimpin-

                    Comment

                    • JohnnyMapleLeaf
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 8456

                      Originally posted by Q-Unit
                      I like him, Moose Johnson isnt so bad, though being a Cowboys fan, that doesnt lend any credibility.

                      though I can tell you, Joe Buck is a tool, and Aikman would be better off with a better play by player that isnt so much of a tool.

                      and just a disclaimer, as best objectively as I can be, I feel like the Pats, Packers, and Cowboys are media-infested circle jerk love affair inducing vomit machines.

                      all the teams they've played are not that good, they will all be tested soon enough. I hope, or just taking the points cuz you dont want to lay chalk on the road, will hurt this season :bang:
                      I agree about Buck...but Aikmen is always right on IMO.

                      From a guy that really has no hardcore fav team...I agree...I can see the love-in teams, and it is so obvious sometimesw...like you pointed out with NE tonight.....Brady...wow, kornhole wanted to blow that guy....

                      Comment

                      • Q-Unit
                        Offensive Coordinator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 5179

                        Originally posted by JohnnyMapleLeaf
                        ANd it continues? The Pats still haven't beat anyone good? Cause Cincy sucks? Or they had no defence? I love it......lmao.....and dallas only beat STL.

                        I'm a fav player who loves Dallas covering. And loves NE covering...sometimes it's smart to pick the right spots with favs just as much it is to pick dogs. I realize it's not as cool...but it can be just as profitable if you;re smart about it.

                        Baseball....12 inning :thumbs:

                        Cleveland +20 next week?? :sm:
                        LOL, but really, it was ridiculous, they were in dime coverage 80% of the time, and NE ran it down their throats.

                        just giving excuses, but yeh, def. not all the dogs win all the time, but laying chalk makes you feel a lot more stupid when it loses compared to a dog thats "supposed to lose"
                        :hide:

                        "Schooly D is fat cake yo."
                        -Big Pimpin-

                        Comment

                        • JohnnyMapleLeaf
                          Banned
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 8456

                          Originally posted by Q-Unit
                          LOL, but really, it was ridiculous, they were in dime coverage 80% of the time, and NE ran it down their throats.

                          just giving excuses, but yeh, def. not all the dogs win all the time, but laying chalk makes you feel a lot more stupid when it loses compared to a dog thats "supposed to lose"
                          True....the dog can generally be the better play, I'm just saying sometimes the fav is the way to go...but alot of dog players just play the dog on principle IMO....especially tonight, cant believe people backed Cincy...and with dallas lately....the smarter plays IMO....I stayed away from Pitt, SD, etc, cause they weren't a good fav that had a very good chance of winning let alone covering.

                          **** I'm drunk though....lol.... :drunk:

                          HOFFMAN TIME...

                          Comment

                          Working...