man what am i missing here? MIA +6??
(1) MIA is picked to finish 2nd in the MACEast behind KentState and returns 14 players including the QB, top 4 rushers, 2 of top 3 WR's and 4 of their top 6 tacklers. The visitor is 7-1 L8 in this series and this has been a very low scoring series over the years. BallState returns 14 starters as well, and is picked to finish 5th on their side of the MAC (which is pretty loaded, though, IMO and definitely the better of the 2 sides).
I just think this is going to be a close football game played in the 20's. almost a TD just seems like a lot of points here in a game that i feel very confident in saying will be decided by less than a TD.
Anyone have any thoughts on this one? I also think the total of 51 is too high. 20-17 final last year and the last score came inside the last 2 minutes (TD by BallState). Defenses are usually ahead of the offenses early in the season and both teams return a decent percentage of their top tacklers from last year.
(1) MIA is picked to finish 2nd in the MACEast behind KentState and returns 14 players including the QB, top 4 rushers, 2 of top 3 WR's and 4 of their top 6 tacklers. The visitor is 7-1 L8 in this series and this has been a very low scoring series over the years. BallState returns 14 starters as well, and is picked to finish 5th on their side of the MAC (which is pretty loaded, though, IMO and definitely the better of the 2 sides).
I just think this is going to be a close football game played in the 20's. almost a TD just seems like a lot of points here in a game that i feel very confident in saying will be decided by less than a TD.
Anyone have any thoughts on this one? I also think the total of 51 is too high. 20-17 final last year and the last score came inside the last 2 minutes (TD by BallState). Defenses are usually ahead of the offenses early in the season and both teams return a decent percentage of their top tacklers from last year.
Comment