Lance Leipold is a head coach of Buffalo. Buff missed the extra point on purpose and they pretended to play 2-pt conversion which they tried not to cover the spread of gambling. Why did Buff play 2-pt conversion for what????? Why did they do that for? When Buff did that I knew immediately Buff WILL NEVER cover the spread. The game was set up which Buff did not want to score anymore in the 3rd & 4th quarters and let the MIA score a TD.
Lance Leipold was cheating with the gambling system
Collapse
X
-
One comment one question: They went for two bc they are a small MAC college and wanted to get the missed extra point back & Why bet on such a horrible game in the first place with as much action as there was on the board last night? Smh!Action gambling only creates a loser! -
They went for two in order to back up by two touchdowns in a game where there was plenty of time left for Miami(OH) to come back. It is a disgrace that you would imply a coach is cheating based on going for a two point conversion in that scenario. You lost your bet because you bet the wrong side, bad beats happen. Do not try and put that on Buffalo's head coach......Comment
-
so if he kicks the extra pt, goes up 13 instead of 12, or even makes both extra points and goes up 14... and Miami oh gets a late td and loses by 6 (or 7) instead of 5, they still cover. the lowest I saw them was +7 and they were mostly +7.5 and as high as +8.5. nowhere did I ever see buffalo -6.5 or less where as any of this would have even mattered. worst case scenario is someone pushes because they got the absolute worst of the line at 7.Comment
Comment