Ok...I am really leaning toward Temple but I am interested in some thoughts. I like Temple's ability to run the ball and the fact that they will be much more motivated and have the advantage of the crowd and the travel. Plus UCLA isn't special on offense although they make make a big play or two with the advantages they have outside.
But I am concerned about one issue. How is Temple going to make plays at the qb position if UCLA really loads the box? This game looks similar in gameplan to the UCLA/Oregon game when Costa started for Oregon. Oregon gained 82 yards through the air and had 43-221 on the ground. Yet they only scored 24 points and two of the scores were a kick and int return and the other was setup by a fumble at the 50. Temple will try and run the football but will they have enough success to win the game? I am leaning toward yes but am interested in others thoughts.
Thanks
But I am concerned about one issue. How is Temple going to make plays at the qb position if UCLA really loads the box? This game looks similar in gameplan to the UCLA/Oregon game when Costa started for Oregon. Oregon gained 82 yards through the air and had 43-221 on the ground. Yet they only scored 24 points and two of the scores were a kick and int return and the other was setup by a fumble at the 50. Temple will try and run the football but will they have enough success to win the game? I am leaning toward yes but am interested in others thoughts.
Thanks
Comment