I'm a big fan of the underdog story, I mean who doesn't like a feel good story.
Appalachian State over Michigan
Boise State over Oklahoma
Utah over Alabama
Those are a few examples of classic underdog stories that will continually be harped on, and they deservedly should be always remembered as such.
However, one game in itself is great, but the journey and body of work to get there really irks me when you consider the BCS.
I know they love controversy because if we aren't all bitching about it, then they aren't getting the attention they want.
Case in point, Boise State is number 4 in the BCS rankings.
1) yes they beat Oregon
2) yes they are undefeated
3) yes they may remain undefeated if they can get by LA Tech and Nevada (not exactly mountainous obstacles)
BUT that really chaps my hide lol that just because they beat a slow start out of the gate Oregon team, and are undefeated, that they are above the likes of Iowa, Miami, USC, LSU, among many.
I mean good money can be bet on if they ever go through a sched like say Miami's:
Florida State
Georgia Tech
Virginia Tech
Oklahoma
and then run into meat of conference sched:
Clemson
Wake Forest
North Carolina
South Florida
I mean the ACC isn't considered a top 3 conference but certainly the WAC isn't either, no way Boise comes out with more than 1 win going through those first 4 games Miami had to go through. And Miami managed only 1 loss. More deserving IMO
but then again that makes too much sense right, the BCS just cares about $ and the false presumption that they are looking out for interests of EVERY school. I mean the schools control their sched right up to a certain degree? then it's up to the schools to earn respect not look to the BCS to bail them out.
I'm done. lol
:beerbang:
Appalachian State over Michigan
Boise State over Oklahoma
Utah over Alabama
Those are a few examples of classic underdog stories that will continually be harped on, and they deservedly should be always remembered as such.
However, one game in itself is great, but the journey and body of work to get there really irks me when you consider the BCS.
I know they love controversy because if we aren't all bitching about it, then they aren't getting the attention they want.
Case in point, Boise State is number 4 in the BCS rankings.
1) yes they beat Oregon
2) yes they are undefeated
3) yes they may remain undefeated if they can get by LA Tech and Nevada (not exactly mountainous obstacles)
BUT that really chaps my hide lol that just because they beat a slow start out of the gate Oregon team, and are undefeated, that they are above the likes of Iowa, Miami, USC, LSU, among many.
I mean good money can be bet on if they ever go through a sched like say Miami's:
Florida State
Georgia Tech
Virginia Tech
Oklahoma
and then run into meat of conference sched:
Clemson
Wake Forest
North Carolina
South Florida
I mean the ACC isn't considered a top 3 conference but certainly the WAC isn't either, no way Boise comes out with more than 1 win going through those first 4 games Miami had to go through. And Miami managed only 1 loss. More deserving IMO
but then again that makes too much sense right, the BCS just cares about $ and the false presumption that they are looking out for interests of EVERY school. I mean the schools control their sched right up to a certain degree? then it's up to the schools to earn respect not look to the BCS to bail them out.
I'm done. lol
:beerbang:
Comment