I want to see what you guys think of this, Starting next season i want to have action on the money line of every underdog i bet in college hoops. They call it madness for a reason, alot of "upsets" happen. Last season i would only randomly take a Dog on the moneyline and somehow i went 3-0 on dogs +600 on the money line. I dont expect to ever get lucky like that again but a winning record isnt required to profit on Dog Mls, this season i havent been trying money lines but a handful of big dogs ive bet on have won outright and i intend on cashing in on those situations in the future.
Ive been thinking along the lines of a Tiered approach to betting dog mls, something like this:
Dogs +4 to +7.5 = 1 unit wager on ML
Dogs +8 to +10.5 = 0.75 unit wager on ML
Dogs +11 to +15 = 0.5 unit wager on ML
Dogs +15.5 to +20 = 0.25 unit wager on ML
Dogs +1 to +3.5 = No ML Wager , not enough take back
Dogs over +20 = No ML Wager, too unlikely
Would like to get some thoughts from you guys on this, thanks in advance for any input.
Ive been thinking along the lines of a Tiered approach to betting dog mls, something like this:
Dogs +4 to +7.5 = 1 unit wager on ML
Dogs +8 to +10.5 = 0.75 unit wager on ML
Dogs +11 to +15 = 0.5 unit wager on ML
Dogs +15.5 to +20 = 0.25 unit wager on ML
Dogs +1 to +3.5 = No ML Wager , not enough take back
Dogs over +20 = No ML Wager, too unlikely
Would like to get some thoughts from you guys on this, thanks in advance for any input.
Comment