1) your original post was intended to portray Obama's questionable patriotism vs. McCain's with the heading: If you were on the outside looking in with a vengeance, at the worlds most powerful nation, which candidate would you prefer.
2) I responded in kind to the post highlighting that one of the main objects in focus the book in Obama's hand is the obvious subject of ridicule or method to "prove" his unpatriotism, in explaining that the book was anything but as such.
3) You responded that you mention nothing of why he was reading the book, that its just pics.
4) I foolishly answered that the book is highlighted and is a main focus of the intended post
5) You come back with the original heading that you want to make the point of Obama's patriotism vs. McCain's from the pics alone.
6) Now I'm :nuts: crosseyed from why you would post something that uses the book as the focal point without knowing what the book was really about, then absolving any significance to it as tool for your argument only to come back and reiterate your original point which obviously needs the book's presumed significance for any merit. :beer2:
2) I responded in kind to the post highlighting that one of the main objects in focus the book in Obama's hand is the obvious subject of ridicule or method to "prove" his unpatriotism, in explaining that the book was anything but as such.
3) You responded that you mention nothing of why he was reading the book, that its just pics.
4) I foolishly answered that the book is highlighted and is a main focus of the intended post
5) You come back with the original heading that you want to make the point of Obama's patriotism vs. McCain's from the pics alone.
6) Now I'm :nuts: crosseyed from why you would post something that uses the book as the focal point without knowing what the book was really about, then absolving any significance to it as tool for your argument only to come back and reiterate your original point which obviously needs the book's presumed significance for any merit. :beer2:
Comment