I detected an error in my program that assigned the wrong performance values when dealing with negative #'s...Ergo a few of those values were incorrect....
This would have manifested itself when an obvious poorer team had far greater performance values than a superior team....I've corrected this flaw on the weekend & so the performance values should better represent the quality team.....
Sorry about that group...:toss:
PIT.....68....63....70.....67
W.V....70....75....75....73
Performance value W.V.....14
VIR.......76....73....78....76
GEO.T...75....80....74....76
Per. value GEO.T....10
TEX.T...66....61....68....65
KAN.....74....80....74....76
Per. value KAN....29
FRE.ST....69....64....70....68
UTA.ST...71....74....74....73
Per. value UTA.St....24
PEP.....74....73....73....73
S.F.....73....75....71....73
Per. value S.F.....11
St.M....74....69....73....72
POR....64....65....62....64
Per. value ST.M....25
LOY....62....62....60....61
S.D....71....73....72....72
Per. value S.D.....22
S.C....64....59....63....62
GON..70....70....68....69
Per. value GON...1
GL all....
:cheers:
This would have manifested itself when an obvious poorer team had far greater performance values than a superior team....I've corrected this flaw on the weekend & so the performance values should better represent the quality team.....
Sorry about that group...:toss:
PIT.....68....63....70.....67
W.V....70....75....75....73
Performance value W.V.....14
VIR.......76....73....78....76
GEO.T...75....80....74....76
Per. value GEO.T....10
TEX.T...66....61....68....65
KAN.....74....80....74....76
Per. value KAN....29
FRE.ST....69....64....70....68
UTA.ST...71....74....74....73
Per. value UTA.St....24
PEP.....74....73....73....73
S.F.....73....75....71....73
Per. value S.F.....11
St.M....74....69....73....72
POR....64....65....62....64
Per. value ST.M....25
LOY....62....62....60....61
S.D....71....73....72....72
Per. value S.D.....22
S.C....64....59....63....62
GON..70....70....68....69
Per. value GON...1
GL all....
:cheers:
Comment